The Relationship Between Democracy, Media Independence and Citizen Journalism with the Press in the Jokowi Era

Authors

  • Mochammad Sinung Restendy Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Noorhaidi Hasan Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Rama Kertamukti Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/mediakita.v9i2.2919

Keywords:

Democracy, Press Freedom, Media Independence, Citizen Journalism, Jokowi

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between democracy, media independence, and citizen journalism during Joko Widodo’s administration. Within the media ecosystem, the press plays a crucial role as an information provider, a social control mechanism, and the fourth pillar of democracy. However, during Jokowi’s presidency, the independence of mainstream media has faced significant challenges. This study identifies that mainstream media in Indonesia have experienced a distortion of independence due to political intervention, media ownership affiliations with those in power, and various regulations that suppress press freedom. This study employs a qualitative approach using Critical Discourse Analysis, allowing data collection from multiple sources, including mainstream media, social media platforms, as well as legal and academic documents. The findings show that democracy and press independence have declined during Jokowi's era. Although citizen journalism provides a new space for freedom of expression, challenges remain in the form of legal threats, political intervention, and difficulties in maintaining information credibility. Therefore, further efforts are required to strengthen press freedom, including regulatory reforms and the enhancement of an independent media ecosystem, to ensure that democracy in Indonesia can develop more robustly. The strategy of diversifying income to reduce dependence on capital owners, government advertising, or conglomerates with political interests is the ideal theory and practice to be offered to the press in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad Maulana Ibrahim dkk. (2024). Pemilihan umum Presiden Indonesia 2024. Wikipedia (Blog). https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pemilihan_umum_Presiden_Indonesia_2024

Ahmad Muhammad Auwal Yakubu M Salisu, dan S. S. S. (2017). Democracy and the Nigerian Media (4th ed.). Bahiti and Dalila Publishers 1.

Alakklouk, B., & Gülnar, B. (2023). The Impact of Citizen Journalism in News Coverage of the Israeli Attacks on Gaza. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 4(4).

Anggoro, A. D. (2016). Media, Politik dan Kekuasaan (Analisis Framing Model Robert N. Entman tentang pemberitaan hasil pemilihan Presiden, 9 Juli 2014 di TV One dan Metro TV). Aristo, 2(2), 25–52.

Arifuddin, M. T. (2016). Why Political Parties Colonise The Media In Indonesia: An Exploration of Mediatization. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 20(1), 16–33.

Arnus, S. H. (2015). Jejak Perkembangan Sistem Pers Indonesia. Jurnal Al-Munzir, 8(1), 103–113.

Aulia Adam dan Damianus Andreas. (2018). 8 Konglomerat Media di Indonesia via Jalur Media TV & Cetak. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/8-konglomerat-media-di-indonesia-via-jalur-media-tv-cetak-cEv7

Bachmann, P., & Ingenhoff, D. (2017). How Do Media Companies Gain Legitimacy? An Experimental Study On The (Ir) Relevance of CSR Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1249282

Boucher, G. (2021). The Frankfurt School and The Authoritarian Personality: Balance Sheet of An Insight. Thesis Eleven, 163(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136211005957

Bruns, A. (2014). Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: New Challenges for Journalism. Brazilian Journalism Research, 10(2), 224–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v10n2.2014.778

Ekayanti, M., & Xiaoming, H. (2018). Journalism and Political Affiliation of the Media: The Influence of Ownership on Indonesian Newspapers. Journalism, 19(9–10), 1326–1343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917734094

Gui, J. (2023). The Connection Between Neoliberal Globalisation and Authoritarian Populism in the US. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 11(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13527

Guzek, D., & Grzesiok-Horosz, A. (2022). Political Will and Media Law: A Poland Case Analysis. East European Politics and Societies, 36(4), 1245–1262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254211049514

Harahap, Ihsan (2020). Kampanye Pilpres 2019 Melalui Media Sosial dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Demokrasi Indonesia. Komunikologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi 15(2). https://doi.org/10.47007/jkomu.v17i01.234

Halmai, G. (2019). Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism. German Law Journal, 20(3), 296–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.23

Jami, W. (2022). Authoritarian Populism. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/qnxk6

Kim‐Leffingwell, S. (2023). Personality Traits, Democratic Support, and Authoritarian Nostalgia. Social Science Quarterly, 104(4), 619–635. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13286

Lasido, N. A. (2023). Landscape Political Economy Media in Kompas Gramedia Group (KGG): A Chomsky’s Media Propaganda Analysis. Potret Pemikiran, 27(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30984/pp.v27i1.2137

Leyshon, M., & Rogers, M. (2020). Designing for Inclusivity: Platforms of Protest And Participation. Urban Planning, 5(4), 33–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3258

Lim, M. (2012). The League of Thirteen: Media Concentration in Indonesia. Merlyna Lim, The League of Thirteen: Media Concentration in Indonesia (Tempe, AZ: Participatory Media Lab at Arizona State University & The Ford Foundation.

Luo, Y., & Harrison, T. M. (2019). How Citizen Journalists Impact The Agendas of Traditional Media and The Government Policymaking Process in China. Global Media and China, 4(1), 72–93.

Masduki. (2020). Public Service Broadcasting and Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. In Palgrave Macmillan. Palgrave Macmillan Singapore.

Mawel dkk. (2021). Kebebasan Pers Memburuk di Tengah Pandemi. Kebebasan Pers Memburuk Di Tengah Pandemi, (pers), 19.

Moleong, L. J. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muradi, M., & Silas, J. (2024). Post Populism: An End-of-Service Jokowi’s Politics for Family. CosmoGov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(1), 150–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v10i1.50951

Neuendorf, K. A., & Kumar, A. (2015). Content Analysis. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 1–10.

Noam, E. (2018). Beyond The Mogul: From Media Conglomerates To Portfolio Media. Journalism, 19(8), 1096–1130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917725941

Noor, R. (2017). Citizen Journalism Vs. Mainstream Journalism: A Study on Challenges Posed By Amateurs. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 3(1), 55–76.

Pahdepie, F. (2014). Media as the Battleground for Politics: The Relation Between Politicians and Media Barons in Indonesian Politics. International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.17994

Power, T. P. (2018). Jokowi’s Authoritarian Turn and Indonesia’s Democratic Decline. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 54(3), 307–338.

Purnama, F. Y. (2022). Paradigm Shift: From Ownership Issues to Political Mediatization. Komunikator, 14(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jkm.16126

Saefulloh, H., & Madu, L. (2022). Manajemen Konflik Hak Penerbitan Berita Google dan Australia. Global Political Studies Journal, 6(2), 71–88.

Sapitri, H., & Nurafifah, N. L. (2020). Private Television Media and Political in Presindential Election 2019 from the Agenda Setting of Perspective. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 24(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33299/jpkop.24.2.3024

Schnyder, G., Radl, M., Toth, F., Kucukuzun, M., Turnšek, T., Çelik, B., & Pajnik, M. (2024). Theorizing and Mapping Media Ownership Networks in Authoritarian-Populist Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Austria, Hungary, Slovenia, and Turkey. Media, Culture & Society, 46(1), 38–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231179366

Souisa, H. Y. (2017). Regulating Convergence: Challenges for Contemporary Media in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 1(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol1.iss1.art3

Syahri, M. (2017). Otonomi Pers di Indonesia. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Tapsell, R. (2017). Media Power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, Citizens and The Digital Revolution (1st ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publisher.

Vuksan-Ćusa, B. (2023). Populist Attitudes in Croatia: First Analysis With Notes on Conceptualisation and Measurement. Politics Cent. Eur, 19, 145–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2023-0007

Wiratraman, H. P. (1959). Press Freedom, Law and Politics in Indonesia: a socio-legal study. Transition, 1956, 34.

Yilmaz, I., & Barton, G. (2021). Political Mobilisation of Religious, Chauvinist, and Technocratic Populists in Indonesia and Their Activities in Cyberspace. Religions, 12(10), 822. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12100822

Downloads

Published

2025-10-10

How to Cite

Restendy, M. S., Noorhaidi Hasan, & Rama Kertamukti. (2025). The Relationship Between Democracy, Media Independence and Citizen Journalism with the Press in the Jokowi Era. Mediakita , 9(2), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.30762/mediakita.v9i2.2919